Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 1581 - 1600 of 7,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 5:08 pm by John J. Sullivan
 Last year it produced a terrific 9th Circuit opinion reinforcing that only the United States, not private plaintiffs, can enforce the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:17 pm
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v Lexmark International Inc, 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 11:22 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
And these folks will not be from just the United States, they’ll be from all over the world. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:41 pm by Steven Cohen
 They state that without these calculations, they are at a disadvantage and can’t double-check that the calculations were done without error. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S.437 (2007); see also Brown v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The FDCA, in turn, defines “drug” as:(A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopœia, official Homœopathic Pharmacopœia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or… [read post]