Search for: "WAL-MART CORPORATION"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
United States, 09-1395 (held since 12/3/10, probably for Wal-Mart) Turner v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:08 pm
A sociologist testified regarding "social framework" analysis, which allegedly showed that Wal-Mart's corporate culture was susceptible to gender bias. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:52 pm
Contrast that with the much-discussed holding in Wal-Mart earlier in the week, and you can see that big corporations do not always win at the Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:35 pm
Scheduled to testify at the hearing is Betty Dukes, the lead plaintiff in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Plaintiffs did not argue that Wal-Mart had any express corporate policy against advancement of women. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
” In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
The gist of the complaint is that Wal-Mart, despite its professed corporate policies against discrimination, ran a decentralized management system in which local and regional managers exercised unsupervised discretion regarding promotions. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:40 am
In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
1) The Conglomerate: Should Securities Law Folks Care About Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
The plaintiffs alleged that Wal-Mart's personnel policy permitted sex biases that pervaded the corporate culture and denied fair opportunity to women. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:59 am
Excellent article on how Wal-Mart’s corporate culture fosters discrimination, and how the employees have now been stripped of their two best hopes: unions and class actions. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:41 pm
However the Court held that since the expert could not estimate what portion of the Wal-Mart's decisions were based upon discriminatory thinking, there was an absence of 'siginificant proof' that the company operated under a general policy of discrimination. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
That’s a big problem: Litigation is costly and expensive, especially against a corporate giant like Wal-mart; many of the women (most hourly workers) may not be able to bring their own cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:47 am
So Wal-Mart goes forward with the plan and covers its tracks, instilling a uniform corporate culture to make sure the plan succeeds. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:44 am
Adler) Overlawyered’s Walter Olson comments on the implications of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:49 am
In the Red: As lead counsel to the plaintiffs in the Wal-Mart Stores Inc employment discrimination lawsuit tossed out by the United States Supreme Court on Monday, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll dedicated about $5 million in attorney hours and spent $2 million on experts and discovery in the decade-long case, Reuters reports After Lipton: Among the elite Wall Street law firms, none is identified as closely with a single individual as Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is with… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:50 am
I thought that I had my final say on Wal-Mart v. [read post]
