Search for: "Warner v. Warner"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 2,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 2:10 am
Indeed, in Commission v France [Katpost here], the CJEU considered that ebooks may be classified as services, rather than goods under the VAT Directive. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
In their complaint, the major labels allege RCN Telecom has been aware for years of rampant copyright infringement by its subscribers, thousands of whom they assert include repeat offenders (UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:52 am
Extended Version:The 2016 FTC v AT&T Mobility decision at the 9th Circuit eliminated the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to enforce privacy rules on ISPs in Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:21 am
Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC et al v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
The remaining matter is now the quantum of damages Escape Media must pay in penalties for the infringement in the action brought by nine record companies including Arista Music, Sony Music Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Bros Records in 2011. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:17 pm
Take, for example, Roe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:35 am
It was discovered in the V&A Archives (where the majority of Potter’s papers reside) in 2015 by an amazingly fortunate editor at publisher Penguin Random House Children’s. [read post]
25 Dec 2019, 10:40 am
The Supreme Court's acceptance of Oracle v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
In recent years that would be a case widely known in the UK as “Abela – v- Hammonds Suddards et al” where I was the coordinator and head of the legal strategy on behalf of my client, A. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:46 am
Sabrina McCubbin posted the court documents from the consolidated cases under Dalmazzi v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:07 am
The difference between plausibility and lack of implausibility was also explored in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 (IPKat). [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 4:58 am
The trade association, which represents the three major recorded music labels, Universal, Sony and Warner as well as many independent labels, sent its first takedown request to Google in July 2011. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
That memory has to be false though because Bugs Bunny is a Warner Brothers character and not part of the Disney universe. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:07 pm
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 94 (2d Cir. 2006)). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
From Bristow v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
White v. [read post]
