Search for: "Way v. State" Results 1581 - 1600 of 59,138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2012, 6:35 pm
The District Court for Middle District of Florida considers the issue - often referred to as respondeat superior - in Donaldson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:29 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The problem is that the court system is an unwieldy way to accomplish that, and defamation cases are often met with motion practice that will prolong the agony and cost you money and even more anguish.The case is Friedman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
I'm not at all confident that the California Supreme Court would come out the same way here. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
 Which, in a way, was a neat little roadmap about how to steal drugs from a pharmacy. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
The Court of Appeal, relying on Lady Hale’s judgment in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] 1 WLR 1545, had considered that the case involved “discrimination in state benefits” and hence that the usually strict test for justification on grounds such as sex or disability gave way to the question of whether the Government’s approach was “manifestly without reasonable foundation”. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:22 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit got its third consecutive unanimous reversal on Tuesday, when the Court decided its first class action case of the year, Mississippi v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:51 pm
These would treat defamation in much the same way that intellectual property issues are treated by section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]