Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me."
Results 1581 - 1600
of 7,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
The Thursday notice now postpones the target date to March 7, 2013, i.e., by four weeks plus one day, and does not state or hint at any particular reason.I believe what mostly complicates this case for the ITC is an interesting combination of antitrust actions in the Unitd States and the European Union. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
Here, let me run through several things that I learned during my trip. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
Last week, a source provided me with a federal grand jury subpoena. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
Lerner & Nelson Lund The District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 11:15 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:33 am
That was the allegation in Lounds v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: EPO suspends decision on new president (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (IAM) (Innovation Partners) (Managing IP) CAFC: Firm disqualified from representing party on appeal where partner served as opponent’s expert at trial: Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:29 pm
CAAF's daily journal for Wednesday, 4 April denied without prejudice the writ appeal in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:45 pm
Simpson trial, I was unclear on what they wanted me to do because no one had ever done it before. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:48 am
The Supreme Court of Alabama addressed a number of bad faith issues in its decision on Jones v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 12:27 pm
Thirteen months ago, State v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:00 am
For the week of April 16 – 23: R. v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Eugene Volokh has graciously invited me to guest-blog this week to introduce the book. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:49 am
The recently-argued case of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Next week, the argument in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm
The Fourth Circuit considered the intersection of open carry and Terry in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
In fact, South Carolina courts have held that, It is patently clear to me that the Legislature stated and intended in clear and unambiguous terms that “in the case of total loss-“ and described the manner by using the words “by fire. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
This week it has a post on Mr Hemming’s change of mind on the ZAM v CFW case. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:09 am
The week’s second argument, Rimini Street v. [read post]
