Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,468
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 5:09 am by Susan Brenner
The court then noted that Gennette’s emails at this point continued to discuss his pet opossum and contained no words or phrases that suggested any sexual activity with either `Amber’ or her `sister’ or in the `sister's’ presence. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 10:50 pm by Steve Baird
As many anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s (TTAB) decision in Blackhorse v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am by Ken White
In Minersville School District v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:19 am by Andrew Frisch
Election Comm’n, 455 U .S. 577, 580 (1982) (stating that, in the absence of clearly expressed legislative intention, the plain language of a statute controls its construction and must be considered conclusive); see also Evenson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
  In other words, “the plaintiff must allege that a well-recognized duty owed under state law was breached by a manufacturer’s conduct that violates the FDCA. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by Susan Brenner
  In other words, it means that Lopez-Cruz’s rights must have been violated. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am by Terry Hart
FilmOn X hearing suggests yet another reason Aereo’s public performance logic is flawed was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesFortnightly v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:22 am
The Appellate Division held that "[u]nder these circumstances, the Comptroller could rationally conclude that [Mruczek's] injury occurred as a result of his misstep while he was engaged in a routine activity rather than a sudden, fortuitous and unexpected event. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:59 am by Susan Brenner
(She granted the “defendant’s” motion, which I assume was Wadsworth’s.) [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court would adopt Leval’s transformative framing in Campbell v. [read post]