Search for: "York v York"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 52,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:37 pm
In New York, the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) requires individuals convicted of certain sex offenses to register as sex offenders with the Division of Criminal Justice Services. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
Judge Benitez cited the US Supreme Court’s opinion in New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am
"] Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
[CPLR 213[2], [8]]Given they could find no error, the AD1 left the dismissal undisturbed.Time to run ….# # #DECISIONG&Y Maintenance Corp. v McSam Hotel Group LLC [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
# # #DECISIONPeople v A.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Grp., LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
DEFENDANTS HADN’T COMMITTED A TORTIOUS ACT “WITHIN THE STATE”Because the defendants’ fire doors exposed the decedent to asbestos, a personal-injury case was filed in the New York County Supreme Court.When the defendants’ motion to have the case dismissed for “lack of jurisdiction” was denied, an appeal ensued.And on its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, thought the court below had committed reversible error, because the… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
Goodyear, Acting Assistant Professor at New York University School of Law and Fellow at the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law Policy, provides an enlightening analysis of the impact of Matal v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
See Grant v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Assoc., LLC v Roadrunner Capital Partners LLC [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:03 pm
Many, however, cannot resist the allure of togetherness, and that brings us to the topic of dating during divorce, and more specifically, the Appellate Division, First Department’s recent decision in Allen v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:35 am
In Selah v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:44 am
Instead, the contract terms governed, and the claims were barred by a "no-action" clause (Chatham Capital Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
Again, this is like saying that there would have been no reason for Congress to enact the First Amendment to the Constitution in 1789 because modern precedents such as New York Times v. [read post]
