Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Athough the Strasbourg Courg had established that the concept of civil rights was autonomous, and not solely defined by signatory countries (Konig v Germany (No1) (A/27) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 ECHR), nevertheless Article 6 could only apply to civil rights that were arguably recognised under domestic law ( as established by the House of Lords in Matthews v Ministry of Defence (2003) UKHL 4, (2003) 1 AC 1163 applied). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
Even if the ACS personnel here involved had been aware of Dr. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
The ACS Blog discusses recent reports that the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:10 pm
After reviewing the precedent cases (Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm) [2002] 2 AC 1, Stuart v Goldberg Linde (a firm) [2008] 1 WLR 823 ) and noting that it would be "wrong to hold that because a matter could have been raised in earlier proceedings it should have been, so as to render the raising of it in later proceedings necessarily abusive" (Lord Bingham in Johnson), and the Art 6 entitlement to access to justice for an arguable case, the Court of Appeal… [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am
This was the case in Daimler Co Ltd v Continental Tyre and Rubber Co (Great Britain) Ltd 1916 2 AC 307. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
The House unanimously dismissed his appeal (see R (Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 72; [2009] 1 AC 335.) [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:20 pm
” Following a 2007 California Court of Appeal decision, ACS Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
As Lord Diplock put it in Attorney General v Leveller Magazine Limited [1979] AC 440 at 450A to C. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
Joel Tenenbaum filed a final brief on Feb. 18, 2010 in Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:15 pm
R(on the application of Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65 This appeal was brought by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“the Foreign Secretary”) against a decision of the Divisional Court to include seven short paragraphs in the open version of a judgment, notwithstanding the fact that the Foreign Secretary had started in a number of Public Interest Immunity Certificates… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:50 pm
Adding to that, over the course of the last few weeks and for the next month, or so, I’ve been prepping and, starting next week, trying a fairly complex sexual assault case remanded for new trial by my state Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
The DJ rejected both submissions, but stated a case for the High Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
The DJ rejected both submissions, but stated a case for the High Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:06 am
The case decision was handed down on January 26, 2010, and was styled, Houston Baptist University, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:48 am
Of moment, the Supreme Court rejected the reasoning of a 2003 decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, ACS Construction Company v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:40 am
Here is the transcript in what we call Lebow(the judge) v. [read post]
