Search for: "Action Communications Inc"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 10,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2014, 8:46 am
The Board noted that there was “nothing in the rule[s] that even arguably suggest[] that protected communications are excluded from the broad parameters. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:59 am
One party to a collective bargaining agreement cannot compel arbitration of a dispute unless the agreement explicitly so providesMatter of Onondaga Community Coll. v Onondaga Community Coll. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
(See here for discussion of conflicts preceding the board action.)Seven days after leaving CIRM at the end of June, Trounson was named to the board of directors of StemCells, Inc., of Newark, Ca., which holds $19.4 million in awards from the agency. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:30 am
Stack, CPA, Director of Operations, Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is an expert in employer communication systems and part of the Amaxx team helping companies reduce their workers compensation costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 12:14 pm
It has sued the Defendants under the Communications Act of 1934 and The Cable & Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at 957,… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
" Although the Board had contend that the statements at issue "are reasonably susceptible of defamatory connotations," the Appellate Division opined that the Board's complaint failed to "make a rigorous showing that the language of the [article] as a whole can be reasonably read both to impart a defamatory inference and to affirmatively suggest that the [Defendants] intended or endorsed that inference," citing Udell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 169 AD3d at 957,… [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:54 am
There is also a look at the Federal Circuit’s decision in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
©2013 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Lack of an emergency action plan. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:30 am
Stack, CPA, Director of Operations, Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is an expert in employer communication systems and part of the Amaxx team helping companies reduce their workers compensation costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:42 pm
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
The district court granted the motion as to certain defendants, but denied the motion as to others; it found plaintiff met the heightened pleading requirements of the PSLRA “by inferring that the remaining defendants had knowledge of WAMU's difficulties with their information systems ‘because of the nature of the statements they [Defendants] were making and the nature of these specific alleged operational problems,’” id., at 781 (quoting In re Northpoint… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:04 am
Fairfax attorney Andaleeb Geloo filed a defamation action against various anonymous posters to the Fairfax Underground site and sought to uncover their identities by issuing subpoenas to Time Warner Cable, Verizon, and Cox Communications. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
In this action the Appellate Division observed that New York State Human Rights Law provides that it is unlawful to retaliate against an employee opposing discriminatory practices.* To establish an unlawful retaliation claim, said the court, an employee [Complainant] must show that "(1) Complainant had engaged in protected activity, (2) Complainant's employer was aware that Complainant participated in such activity, (3) Complainant suffered an adverse employment action… [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
In this action the Appellate Division observed that New York State Human Rights Law provides that it is unlawful to retaliate against an employee opposing discriminatory practices.* To establish an unlawful retaliation claim, said the court, an employee [Complainant] must show that "(1) Complainant had engaged in protected activity, (2) Complainant's employer was aware that Complainant participated in such activity, (3) Complainant suffered an adverse employment action… [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:06 am
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., 663 F.3d 556, 568, 570-71 (2d Cir. 2011). [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
Wok & Pan, Ind., Inc., 909 F.3d 1134, 1139 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:05 am
Exchange Act Rule 21F-17, adopted in 2011 under the auspices of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, prohibits any person from taking any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the SEC, including by “enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 12:49 pm
Exchange Act Rule 21F-17, adopted in 2011 under the auspices of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, prohibits any person from taking any action to impede an individual from communicating directly with the SEC, including by “enforcing, or threatening to enforce, a confidentiality agreement . . . . [read post]
