Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
And this week the IPKat has also learned the details of the Competition Law Association's Golding Essay Prize, courtesy of his still-technically-young friend Christopher Stothers (Arnold & Porter): Following the Supreme Court’s judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences (noted here), a prize of £1,000 is to be awarded for an essay of up to 5,000 words submitted by a student, trainee solicitor, pupil barrister, devil barrister (from Scotland),… [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:31 am
Case Name: In The Interest of FM: BA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Some say it could be the biggest ruling since Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
" The actress started using the stage name Mary Carey in 2002 and ran for California governor against Arnold Schwarzenegger. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Three law firms -- Arnold & Porter, Dorsey & Whitney, and Fredrikson & Byron -- received awards at the event for their pro bono representation. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:28 am
Relying on Andrews v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:58 am
Arnold, 06-50581 (9th Cir., April 21, 2008). [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Perry v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:31 am
Arnold Industries, Inc., 328 So.2d 471, 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) (overruled on other grounds by, Village of Tequesta v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:31 am
Arnold Industries, Inc., 328 So.2d 471, 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) (overruled on other grounds by, Village of Tequesta v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Saturday, April 6, 2024 Tags: Climate Disclosure, order, SEC, securities act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2024 Annual Meeting Filing and Disclosure Requirements Posted by Brian V. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm
Arnold Gorchow. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
Arnold J, ordering an expedited trial, refused Sky's application for a stay. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
However, this case was contrasted by the non-fashion design right case of Dyson Limited v Vax [2010] where Dyson lost the case due to the approach by Arnold J in assessing the individual character. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am
Some of you certainly remember the Google v Vuitton case decided by the CJEU some years ago now, in 2010, which was a case about trade mark infringement. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
The clue here is in para 189 where Arnold J warns helpfully thatFurthermore, although I cannot prejudge later arguments in this case, it is not inevitable that future applicants will recover all their costs even if successful: compare the practice in respect of Norwich Pharmacal orders, as to which see Totalise plc v Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
Myles had spoken with Justice Richard Arnold to ensure consistency with the views of the UK judges in his comments. [read post]
