Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm by Aviva Cuyler
Featured Document: Unfair Insurance Practices Act Can Give Rise To Private Cause Cameron Totten, a California lawyer specializing in consumer bankruptcy, foreclosure defense, mortgage lender liability and general civil litigation.Featured Document: Plaintiff v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The testimony helped convict two defendants of bank fraud. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Jacklyn Fetbroyt
  Thereafter, the CFPB disclosed a brief filed in a legal action against the Bureau styled as California Reinvestment Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Clawbacks, Proxy season, SEC, SPACs Top 5 SEC Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:01 am by Thomas Kaufman
By Thomas Kaufman  (follow me on Twitter) On June 4, 2012, the California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, issued Iskanian v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
If you are a trademark owner suing over competitive keyword ads, you are almost certainly making a bad business decision, and your attorney might be milking your bank account. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Guerrero , No. 06-2745 Conviction for aiding and abetting an armed bank robbery and the use and carrying of firearms in relation to that offense is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) his post-arrest statements were obtained in violation of Miranda; 2) the underlying evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; and 3) evidence of his two prior bank robberies should have been excluded under Fed. [read post]