Search for: "Best v. Best"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 41,826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 6:08 am
[But v]iewpoint neutral implementation or enforcement of broad or vague terms such as "promotes or endorses social causes," "harassing," or "offensive terms" may prove difficult. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
My goal in this paper is to identify the analytical framework best suited to answering these questions, with particular attention to Canada. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
”, and the answer is best understood if you put your mind into the world of high fashion where things do not always have the same meaning that us logic [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 10:30 pm
In recent years, it has become apparent that, despite the shared obligation for all Member States to adhere to the same fundamental rights standards, their practices are sometimes not in line with these standards (see for example the Dutch life long prison sentence which was not in line with Article 3 ECHR until recently (Murray v. the Netherlands, app. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
To be sure, in a series of cases staring with the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:26 am
The 2016 Conover v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:44 pm
Minteer v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:55 pm
In the Smith v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In Rubio v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 8:25 am
My other books include The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 12:34 pm
” Shoff v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
For businesses, this probably means a quasi-competitor at best. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
Ct. 2023) Written postnuptial agreements are the best way to enforce a promise after the marriage and before the divorce. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:18 am
” Beyers v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of 2023. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:33 am
In R.B. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:11 am
Cash.[3] Cash v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 12:00 am
This technique was used, for example, by the ECtHR in X v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:42 pm
This hearing takes its name from the 1971 Florida Supreme Court case of Richardson v. [read post]
