Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2010, 11:36 am
Foreign financial institutions seeking to offer them to retail customers within the United States will now have to offer such contracts through one of the other legal mechanisms available under the CEA for accessing U.S. retail customers. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Factual background In 2016, MUR (the shipowner, a Dutch company) and RTI (the charterer, a Jersey company and subsidiary of United Company Rusal plc) entered into a contract of affreightment. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
The Commission sought leave to file an amicus brief stating that a No-AG agreement is a “convenient method” for brand-name drug companies to pay generic patent challengers to delay their entry into the market, and that the Third Circuit’s K-Dur decision should not be limited to overt cash payments. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
This decision reversed the district court’s earlier ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 5:32 am
Connecticut and Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:07 pm
Eyeworks (1709 Copyright Blog) Spain Madrid court confirms YouTube’s host status – Telecinco v YouTube (JIPLP) Ukraine GO OGLE domain name action: retrial ordered (Class 46) United Kingdom P2P lawyers facing discipline for demanding cash from innocents (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Ryanair wins domain name dispute over ‘ihateryanair.co.uk’ (IP Whiteboard) EWHC: tvcatchup.com may not be broadcasting – but it might be communicating: ITV… [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
United States The ABA Journal reports that a Federal Judge has dismissed a libel claim in the case of Folta v New York Times, Case 1:17cv246-MW-GRJ, hold that a University of Florida professor’s emails are public records that trigger the state’s fair reports privilege. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Or, how I turned a $70 filing fee into $23M in cash – Chint, Schneider Electric patent dispute (Patent Baristas) Europe EU report ‘United States Barriers to Trade and Investment Report 2008’ (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Intellectual Property Watch) (The IP Factor) Swedish EU presidency mooting European standard for patent searches (BLOG@IP::JUR) Wine growers, take note: new Regulation for designations (Class 46) OHIM lays down… [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:21 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
Cardone Capital’s website boasts a portfolio of multi-tenant properties across the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
The proxy statement shows that the company paid its directors the following amounts in 2010: Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash($) Stock Awards($) Option Awards($) All Other Compensation($) Total($) William V. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Here’s the intro: On December 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida held in SEC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 11:33 am
There is currently a case being considered by the SJC, Freiner v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
Of course this might be a mere statistical blimp which doesn’t impact much in the long term on either cash flow or the value of the business or in fact it may not be related to the breakup but some longer term trend with the company – such as its overall management, its failure to innovate, the effect of competition, etc. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Board BTU tax Buckeye Check Cashing budget negotiations Bugs Burt Neuborne Burwell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm
United States, which interprets a clause in the Internal Revenue Code and holds that to convict a defendant under the “Omnibus Clause,” the government must prove the defendant was aware of a pending tax-related proceeding, such as an investigation or audit, or could foresee such a proceeding. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
In support of that assertion, the State cites United States v. [read post]
