Search for: "Campbell v. State"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,046
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:30 am
Thomas Estate (1985), 19 D.L.R. (4th) 594 (B.C.C.A.) at para. 47 and the reference therein to the speech of Viscount Cave in Donald Campbell & Co. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 5:45 am
In Hoepker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It should be noted that many schools do not presently share at-graduation employment statistics with USNWR, and probably all of them would be better off, to some degree or another.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BENEFITAt grad v. 10 monthElon 10.2%, 78.7%Dayton 30.0%, 87.1%Willamette 30.6%, 85.2%Texas A&M 46.9%, 93.8%Gonzaga 31.7%, 83.7%Regent 31.2%, 83.1%Houston 31.9%, 81.9%Arkansas 39.3%, 86.6%Northern Illinois 26.3%, 77.5%Samford 31.4%, 80.7%Arkansas-Little Rock 7.1%, 64.6%DePaul 32.3%,… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 1:11 pm
The case is TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
It should be noted that many schools do not presently share at-graduation employment statistics with USNWR, and probably all of them would be better off, to some degree or another.SCHOOLS LIKELY TO BENEFITAt grad v. 10 monthElon 10.2%, 78.7%Dayton 30.0%, 87.1%Willamette 30.6%, 85.2%Texas A&M 46.9%, 93.8%Gonzaga 31.7%, 83.7%Regent 31.2%, 83.1%Houston 31.9%, 81.9%Arkansas 39.3%, 86.6%Northern Illinois 26.3%, 77.5%Samford 31.4%, 80.7%Arkansas-Little Rock 7.1%, 64.6%DePaul 32.3%,… [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
Additional Resources: Campbell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 2:02 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:53 am
It goes something like this:Jury verdict for $800,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5M in punitive damages;Punitive damages reduced by trial court to $32M;Punitive damage award reinstated by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court;Remanded by US Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new ruling in State Farm v Campbell;Affirmed again by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed again by Oregon Supreme Court;Now vacated by U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
al : LexisNexis, 2011 1 v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
Campbell, 510 U.S. at 590-91. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
As the US Supreme Court stated in the landmark Campbell decision, the fair use doctrine “permits and requires courts to avoid rigid application of the copyright statute when, on occasion, it would stifle the very creativity that the law is designed to foster. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Palmer used twitter to announce his plan to sue after the state election. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 3:36 am
Case Name: Betty Mathisen, Harold Shipley, Patricia Brown, Vicki Ruiz, Bobby Shipley, Jr., Jimmy Shipley, Monica Miller and Robin Shipley v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Campbell, Thompson & Knight LLP [read post]
