Search for: "Carter v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2024, 4:32 am by Curtis Bradley
To take one example, in upholding an executive agreement made by President Jimmy Carter settling the Iran hostage crisis, the Court in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:07 pm by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
One of the most recent and well-known cases in the United States would be Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 4:01 am by Andrew Flavelle Martin
Ontario is unique among Canadian provinces and territories in this respect. [10] Law Society of Alberta v Madu, 2024 ABLS 20. [11] Martin, supra note 5 at 4. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 SCR 331, for example, the Court struck down the criminal prohibition of physician-assisted dying, finding that it violated the s. 7 rights of competent adults seeking such assistance as a result of a grievous and irremediable medical condition causing enduring and intolerable suffering, and that this violation was not justified under s. 1. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The principal authority on which movants relied was the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Mahoney-Buntzman v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:25 am by Eric Goldman
He had the password inscribed on the inside of his wedding ring. * U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm by Andrew Koppelman
This is the case for law-making pursuant to Article I, Section 7, for admitting new states to the union pursuant to Article IV, Section 3, and even for calling a new constitutional convention pursuant to Article V. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:30 pm by Mark Nevitt
In light of anticipated litigation, Pentagon lawyers should re-familiarize themselves with Witt v. [read post]