Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 It stated that the claimant had been passing confidential information to ex-employees of CSP who were working for a rival agency and that criminal proceedings were being considered (for the full text, see [4]). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:40 am by Lyle Denniston
At issue in the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm by David Smith
It stated the rent as being payable both six monthly in advance and had a separate clause stating it was payable monthly. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm by David Faustman
Copyright: bbourdages / 123RF Stock Photo Last June, the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm by David Smith
It stated the rent as being payable both six monthly in advance and had a separate clause stating it was payable monthly. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Marty Lederman
  The SG further argues that "when a congressional committee issues a subpoena, it must be authorized by a delegation from the full chamber that identifies the legislative purpose with sufficient particularity" and that "any information sought must be pertinent to the stated legislative purpose. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by team
On July 4th 2006, the Grand Chamber of the E.C.H.R ruled by 12 votes against 5 votes, in case Ramirez Sanchez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:03 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 5:15 am by Beth Van Schaack
  San Jose-based Cisco has been sued along with its CEO John Chambers and other executives. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
Sara Mansoori is a barrister specialising in media law at Matrix Chambers [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am by Fiona de Londras
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]