Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 1601 - 1620 of 14,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Lovechilde
" The plaintiffs have until March 29 to seek review by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am by Amy Howe
The justices granted review today, but it denied a cross-petition filed by the plaintiffs, who asked the court to weigh in on whether the expropriation exception applies to Germany when the relics are not in the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am by Susan Hennessey
Upcoming Proceedings and Developments in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:56 am by Amy Howe
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, “turned out to be one of those narrow decisions that Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. has touted as the way to achieve greater unanimity. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
(At least to me.)So a partial dissent by the soon-to-be-retired Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 10:06 am
Powell, Jr. at the Supreme Court of the United States from 1981 to 1982 and for the Honorable Frank M. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm by azatty
He was hired by the then-United States Attorney, Jack D.H. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Jake Laperruque
Specifically, John Demers, the head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division, claims that because the new provision will give the amicus access to additional sensitive materials, the reform will cause allies to stop sharing valuable intelligence with the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In writing the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: “We express no view on the soundness of the policy. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
For example, federal courts always have jurisdiction over suits to which the United States is a party. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:52 am
Garre as United States Solicitor General. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh did not publicly signal how they voted, but they must have provided the two remaining votes necessary to revive the portion of the law dealing with the state form. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:04 am by Adam Schlossman
  The statement was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse takes aim at the chief justice’s failure to mention the Supreme Court nomination stalemate in his year-end report on the federal judiciary, invoking “Chief Justice Rehnquist, and the deft way he used his office’s ability to command an audience” in speaking up for judicial independence, and regretting Roberts’ reluctance to do the same; she argues that there “should… [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:45 am
Brian Dearing Docketed: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Case Nos.: (05-0405) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Feb 1 2007 Application (06A754) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 13, 2007 to March 15, 2007, submitted to The Chief Justice. [read post]