Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Sexual AssaultR. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
"It does put them in a little bit of quandary," said Randy Maniloff, a Philadelphia-based lawyer who represents insurance companies and has closely followed the wave of litigation spawned by the Aug. 29, 2005, hurricane. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 3:44 am
Decisions concerning Article 75 motions seeking a stay of arbitration Schenectady v Schenectady PBA, 285 AD2d 725 NYC Transit Authority v Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1056, 284 AD2d 466  The PBA Case The Schenectady Police Department unilaterally placed police officer Cheryl Flory on medical leave, effective April 10, 2000 to July 3, 2000, pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act [FMLA]. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The Court of Appeal has subsequently held in Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:01 am by Sarah Harrison
The Impoundment Control Act It is widely agreed that the president does not have the authority to unilaterally impound federal funds. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
  In Kopecky v Slovakia (2005) 41 EHRR 944  it was said that A1P1 "does not guarantee the right to acquire property". [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]