Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
”  I’m sorry, but I thought that the answer to any question involving ACCA was “unconstitutionally vague,” including “what does ACCA taste like? [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
” Ingrid Wuerth linked us to her new commentary on Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Stewart Baker posted this week’s Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 11:47 am by Garrett Hinck
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
In what fundamental respect does your book – and especially the research that supports it – differ from those books? [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
While last week's rejection of the Google Settlement by Judge Denny Chin received plenty of airing (see IPKat here, 1709 Blog here), the Chet Baker Class Action in Canada is worth taking a look it. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:23 am by Dave
  What the case does demonstrate is that, to the extent that the effects of the changes can be predicted, they are likely to have a disproportionate impact in certain areas and on certain groups in those areas, and all for a saving of £1 billion from a £22 billion hb bill. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hodges expressly overruled the Court’s only prior ruling directly on same-sex marriage — a one-line decision in the 1972 case of Baker v. [read post]