Search for: "Downs v. State of California" Results 1601 - 1620 of 6,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2016, 10:39 am by Eric Goldman
This is the latest–and perhaps last–development in a decade-long effort by legislators, state AGs and local prosecutors to shut down online adult classified ads, first on Craigslist and then on Backpage. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:02 am
Her lawsuit claimed discrimination under California state law, which is similar to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York State Human Rights Law. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:51 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
AT&T Mobility LLC, 584 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2009), which struck down a class waiver in an arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:30 pm by Allen, Flatt, Ballidis & Leslie
It was with great pleasure to read that in the last few weeks a rather significant (but probably largely ignored) decision was handed down by the California Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
If you decide to go down that path, with full knowledge of the issue preclusion consequences of your strategic choices, to me, you can hardly be heard to complain about that result. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am by Daniel Hemel
Becerra, he voted to strike down a California law that required licensed “crisis pregnancy centers” to notify women about the availability of abortions. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
 Indeed, that setting the guy free like the federal court did was an "affront to the judges of this state. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:28 pm
I wholeheartedly approve.Third, I also like how Justice Sills critiques a California Supreme Court case (here, Cosper v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm by Kevin Kaufman
If we accept the state’s argument that it’s an excise tax, then it’s probably an unconstitutional one, because it fails to meet the nexus requirements established in cases like Complete Auto Transit v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:00 pm
Vikram David Amar has this column at FindLaw discussing a California ruling on pupil assignments that may serve as an alternative to the Seattle and Louisville race-based pupil assignment plans if the the Supreme Court turns them down. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]