Search for: "Downs v. USA"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 5:44 am
[USA Today via ABA Journal] * Bob Cohn of TheAtlantic.com sat down with Justice Stephen Breyer to talk about confirmation hearings, the future of SCOTUS and blogs, and why he might be glad his doppelganger Justice has stepped down. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:52 am
Yesterday was not a banner day for MLS clubs as Columbus lost in penalty kicks to Rocherster (USL-1), Wilmington (USL-2) bested Chicago, Harrisburg (USL-2) upset New England in extra time, Charleston (USL-1) put the smack down on Chivas USA. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 2:14 pm
In Beltronics USA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
This is because it does not mention or appear to even take into account the landmark 2004 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:45 pm
Massachusetts is another in a line of cases about determining when the rule the Court set down in Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(IP finance) International bank of IP: a proposal for knowledge liberalisation (IPKat) How to fight fakes in a down economy (Managing Intellectual Property) Global - Patents Nations work to make IP systems combat climate change (Intellectual Property Watch) When prioritising IP, look to green tech (Technology Transfer Tactics) Global - Copyright What is the (copy)right way to maximise IP rights upon insolvency? [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:22 am
Twenty minutes into the game, the U.S. is down 2-0.U.S. starting line-up------------Howard---------------Spector---Onyewu---DeMerit---Bornstein-------Bradley----Kljestan-----------Dempsey-----Donovan-------Beasley----------Altidore------------------I have lots of problems already. 1. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:06 pm
Philip Morris USA, 346 F.3d 1287, 1300 (11th Cir. 2003). [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
June 26, 2009 - Supreme Court Hands Down Bevy of Opinions COURT FINDS VAGUENESS IN CURRENT LAW AND SPLITS ON EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPELLATE DECISIONEdwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
Fendi USA, Inc. 134 F.3d 48 (2nd Cir. 2002). [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:00 am
T-Mobile USA, Inc., 560 F.3d 1087 (Mar. 27, 2009), the court struck down an arbitration clause with a class action ban as unconscionable under Oregon law. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:51 pm
USA v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:46 am
Department of Labor has been cracking down on joint employers in FLSA cases. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:46 am
Department of Labor has been cracking down on joint employers in FLSA cases. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:06 am
For example, in Ting v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
In his column, Milbank pokes fun at the Supreme Court justices hearing the oral arguments of Ricci v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
Cal Supremes grant review on Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press": thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch,… [read post]
