Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 4,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Both the claimant and a fellow female employee were romantically involved with a third, male employee. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:17 am
As the plaintiffs in BHA v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Weber State Univ. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
One of the most cheerful souls you are ever likely to encounter in the often oh-so-serious world of intellectual property is this Kat's friend and fellow blogger Tania Phipps-Rufus. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 5:47 am
According to the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:30 am
Sara Mayeux, Sharswood Fellow, University of Pennsylvania Law School, has posted What Gideon Did, which is to appear in the Columbia Law Review 116 (2016):Clarence Earl Gideon (DOJ)Many accounts of Gideon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
The brochure says to measure your head, position the helmet low on the forehead, adjust the side straps to form a "v" shape under the ears, and center the left buckle under the chin. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:10 am
“We need clarity from the Supreme Court to protect essential computer security research,” said Naomi Gilens, the Frank Stanton Legal Fellow at EFF. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:08 am
Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
With Black people holding power in the Republican Party, it is Robert who helps John land his appointment to the Supreme Court.At first, John is awed by his fellow justices, but the country is changing. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:25 am
As is well established, judgments delivered in exercise of powers under Article 142 are not precedent and are generally not relied upon as having laid down principles as has been confirmed recently in State of Punjab v Rafiq Masih. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:08 am
For those who enjoy a more detailed and lucid account of this Opinion than this blogger can provide, fellow blogger Eleonora -- a talented linguist as well as a copyright enthusiast -- has posted this analysis on the IPKat. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
Greiner submitted an Affidavit stating he wouldn't solicit or hire IBM employees for almost two years. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:21 am
This year's first day of the new term saw the re-argument of Sessions v. [read post]
