Search for: "Fee v. Fee"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Fees. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 11:55 am
Regnier v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
Supreme Court established the legal standard for these claims in its landmark 2010 decision in Jones v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:32 pm
Some defendants were able to deter RCDI by filing a motion arguing that its patent is invalid under Alice v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
” (quoting Budinich v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 3:50 am
Hickory Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:27 am
On May 4, 2009, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the ruling in the Atlanta Divorce case of Patel v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:37 pm
Ocean Harbor House Homeowners Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:02 am
Innovention Toys, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
In Bhattacharjee v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 6:23 pm
In an appeal from the 8th District Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, the Ohio Supreme Court decided the case of Zappitelli v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:42 pm
The dispute is whether judges must award fees to a prevailing party under the Copyright Act. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
The post PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY FEDERAL SYSTEMS, et al. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:43 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
In Horowitch v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:20 am
” Mason v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:00 am
In In re Late Fee and Over-Limit Fee Litigation, 2007 WL 4106353 (N.D. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
Judy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
BAURKOT, ESQ., Non-Party-Appellants, DAYANARA RODRIGUEZ, an infant by her , Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
