Search for: "Fields v State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 11,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am by JB
The Fourteenth Amendment did not prevent this kind of law, because it said nothing about social equality between the races.Justice Field wrote for all the Justices (including Harlan): "[T]he purpose of the [Equal Protection] clause ... was to prevent hostile and discriminating state legislation against any person or class of persons. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am by Brian A. Comer
  We believe this objectivity requirement is consistent with the quality control element of [State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Under the doctrine, named after the Supreme Court’s 1950 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Four years ago people advocating the abolition of software patents made a lot of noise, including a movie named Patent Absurdity, about a case pending then before the Supreme Court of the United States: Bilski v. [read post]