Search for: "Ford v State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am by Kedar
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of New Hampshire and Oregon (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of law professors (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-623 Case name: Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ford, addresses the the use of breathalyzers in the school context. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:46 am by Steve Hall
The standard for competency at execution was set by Ford v Wainwright, a 1986 case in which the Supreme Court said that the Eighth Amendment’s bar against cruel and unusual punishment forbids execution of the “insane. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Steve Lubet
Congress has historically met in joint session for the State of the Union address. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am by Jack Goldsmith
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Ford Motor Co., 922 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
The Supreme Court further observed that the Stateconceded that the claim at issue did not ripen until the"new evidence" provided support for the competency claim:The State acknowledges that Ford-based incompetencyclaims, as a general matter, are not ripe untilafter the time has run to file a first federalhabeas petition.Panetti v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Flores No. 93,973 Ford CountyMorgan B. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:03 am by Amy Howe
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison looks at the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
”  Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 2254(d)(2); and (2) whether a state court that denies funding to an indigent petitioner who has no other means of obtaining evidence of his mental retardation has denied petitioner his “opportunity to be heard,” contrary to Atkins and Ford v. [read post]