Search for: "Franke v. Franke" Results 1601 - 1620 of 6,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 4:23 pm by BuckleySandler
Because it is authorized under Title X of Dodd-Frank, it is not subject to the Jan. 21, 2013 final rule deadline for rules under Title XIV of Dodd-Frank. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:00 pm
v=j-WLWBsIsL0Video Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991 backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:57 pm by John Jascob
The SEC and the human rights group had both hoped the appeals court would take yet another look at the commercial speech issue presented by the case in light of the court’s en banc ruling in a related case over a year ago ( National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am by John Jascob
’” A lengthy dissent, however, objected to the majority ruling (National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:40 am by Unknown
According to the SEC in the challenged order, the claimants are entitled to an award based only on what the SEC actually collected prior to the bankruptcy (Barr v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:08 am
On Thursday the Nevada Supreme Court heard argument in the direct appeal of Ruffa v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:55 pm by DiscoveryResources.org Editor
In Her Honor's latest eDiscovery-related opinion, Pension Comm. of Univ. of Montreal Pension Plan v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:33 am by Walter Olson
In the settlement of the class action Kumar v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Asylum and fear of religious persecution in India: SSHD v Lata" in Law & Religion UK, 24 July 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/07/24/asylum-and-fear-of-religious-persecution-in-india-sshd-v-lata/. [read post]
2 May 2012, 1:12 pm
  Not only do they lose (twice) and run up legal fees (on both sides), but their arguments on appeal are -- to be frank -- super weak. [read post]