Search for: "General Accident Insurance Co"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 10:53 am
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 11:10 am
ING Insurance Co. of Canada [2008] O.J. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
State Farm stipulated to vacate the judgment, and defendant submitted an answer stating that she had insurance at the time of the accident. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:16 pm
The signature aspect of these cases is a demand by counsel for the tort claimant soon after the accident that the insurer pay its full limits within a short period of time (e.g. 30 days) that is generally less than the insurer would ordinarily need to conduct an investigation of the claim against its insured. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 5:04 am
And this was so even though the blood alcohol level of the driver was still above the legal limit 3 hours after the accident. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:31 am
Best Co. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
Co., 251 Ga. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 9:34 am
The appeal of RBC General Insurance Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:58 am
Co., Inc. v TIG Ins. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:06 am
The company issues, in general, participating policies. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
In rejecting this argument and finding that American Home was obligated to both defend and indemnify Christa notwithstanding the intervening dismissal of its third-party action against Spring Lake, the court held: The language of defendant's additional insured provision "focuses not upon the precise cause of the accident, as defendant[] urge[s], but upon the general nature of the operation in the course of which the injury was sustained"… [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
II Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 7:07 pm
., Rensselaer Co., decided 1/26/2009) New York's No-Fault Law was enacted in 1973 to assure prompt and full compensation for economic loss and to provide for non-economic loss in the case of serious injury. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Shell Oil Co., 2 Cal.3d 245, 251 (1970). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:16 pm
The Plan refuses to accept anything less than the $100,000 policy limit or at least the amount after attorney fees to collect it, leaving the victim no money for being out of work, providing no pain and suffering, no co-pay assistance and generally causing this life to be in turmoil. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:28 am
See generally Yenom Corp. v 155 Wooster St. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
Co. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:29 pm
Accident Prior to 2008, California courts consistently held an insured's intentional or deliberate act is not an accident for purposes of the “occurrence” definition of a general liability policy, regardless of whether the insured intended to cause the resulting harm. [read post]
