Search for: "Holiday v. State"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,357
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
Recently, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, in the case of Burton v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:15 pm
(The mother had countered this by stating the father could have more time during holidays and the Summer.) [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:34 am
Here are a few of the most popular: Employee v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
" Gaudin, 415 F.3d at 1035; see also Whallon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
In Meade v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Cook v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
An example of this was last year’s case of Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (No 2) a case which involved British teachers employed by the British government to work in an international (not British) enclave. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 5:11 pm
There simply wasn’t much to report, perhaps due to the holidays. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
He said: “The key would be to make the cards available only to members of print newsgathering organisations or magazines who have signed up the new body and its code… The public at large would know journalists carrying such cards are bone fide operators committed to a set of standards and a body to who complaints can be made…I think the beauty of the system, the attraction of the system, is it will be the newspaper industry registering and disciplining journalists, not the… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
The decision in Von Hannover v Germany (No. 2) is the second of two given on 7 February 2012 by the Grand Chamber concerning the balancing of privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:57 am
Nguyen v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
By reason of her mental state, she was extremely vulnerable. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:20 am
" The second case (von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (App Nos. 40660/08 ; 60641/08)) concerned Princess Caroline and involved the publication of a photograph showing Princess Caroline and her husband Ernst August von Hannover during a skiing holiday in St Moritz in 2002. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am
He opposed a national holiday for the Rev. [read post]
