Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
The final case, Tabeel Lewis v The State is also from the Republic of Trinidad & Tobago and will be heard on Thursday 10 March 2011. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of Matrix Chambers and of the Inforrm Committee. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:53 pm by Paul A. Prados
  A recent case concluded in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, KnowCampaign v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:12 pm
Governor Walker and the Badger state GOP legislators will emerge far stronger for facing down the fury of the public employee unions, and the people... [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:17 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Labor RLA; preemption The Railway Labor Act does not completely preempt retaliatory-discharge claims under state law. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:35 pm
The RecordTV v MediaCorp TV Singapore (2010) case was cited. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
We’re returning to the topic of implied Buckman preemption today to discuss three recent decisions, Hughes v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The only “media case” amongh the five was Novaya Gazeta V Voronezhe v. [read post]