Search for: "In Re Anonymous"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 6,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The court's earlier decision was also based on the court's conclusion - relying on a recent Ninth Circuit case (In re Anonymous Online Speakers) - that the statement in question was commercial speech. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
The decision reverses the earlier opinion and re-permits the long-established practice of anonymity with regard to the names of owners of auctioned works. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 11:47 am
Attorney's Office's theory is that we're confederates, or who know about Shafer's activities, or that we're his sock puppets, or what. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
This re-posting was followed by additional allegedly defamatory statements by anonymous users. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 10:06 am
It said contributors could still send documents and tips through its anonymous submission tool. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
They’re here. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
They’re here. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 8:41 am
[Thanks to JL Dunn for the pointer] [*If you're not familiar with wikileaks.org, you should be; they are, in the words of their wikipedia entry, "a website that publishes anonymous submissions and leaks of sensitive governmental, corporate, organizational, or religious documents, while attempting to preserve the anonymity and untraceability of its contributors. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:39 am
Although there is always some risk of Re-Identification, when data sets are anonymized and stored properly, re-identification is no easy task. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:29 am
In the current issue of Legal Week, you can find both a breathless and statistics-distorting lead editorial, which I commend immediately to your e-dustbin (71% is "almost three-quarters," while 61% is "well under two-thirds"—how about the simpler truth that they're 10 percentage points, or about one part in seven, apart?) [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:53 am
Here’s a list of basic steps you can take to make sure you’re doing mobile search all the way: 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:31 am
I end with a few choice points in the Comments section of Catherine Baksi’s excellent article for your perusal, delectation and delight: Submitted by Anonymous on Mon, 06/09/2010 – 13:07. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
The first edition was published in 1818 though it was published anonymously. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:50 am
Never before has the true spirit of 4chan, Anonymous, and LulzSec been captured on film. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
Hey, FTC and SEC, I hope you're paying attention! [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:45 pm
We're not taking this lightly. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 7:24 pm
.” When the New York Times climate blog is saying this, you’re in real trouble. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 10:45 pm
It’s likewise helpful to communicate, though politely and with a smile, “We’re here, we’re gun owners, get used to it. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am
We’re blawgers, dammit. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:58 pm
Without adequate protection to privacy, security and anonymity of communications, no one can be sure that his or her private communications are not under states’ scrutiny. [read post]
