Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 7:50 am
Cal. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm
If the merger fails, they're not immune. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
You're a resident on the lands of the taxing sovereign. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 12:22 pm
When you're legally compelled to enter into such proceedings, they're covered, at least for your run-of-the-mill arbitration in the current legal milieu.So while I understand where Justice Ikola comes from, and again agree with the disposition of this particular case, I would disagree with his foundational premise. [read post]
10 May 2017, 12:08 pm
It seems we're going directly to farce without the intervening tragedy. [read post]
1 May 2007, 6:00 am
In addition to my own preliminary thoughts on Fireside Bank (the one-way intervention case), more blogosphere commentary can be found at Wage Law by Michael Walsh (who has two separate posts on the case), Cal Biz Lit (Bruce Nye), and Legal Pad (Mike McKee). [read post]
26 May 2008, 9:57 pm
In re Yahoo! [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Thus, Debtors re-converted their case to a chapter 7. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Thus, Debtors re-converted their case to a chapter 7. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Thus, Debtors re-converted their case to a chapter 7. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:24 pm
LEXIS 241 (Cal. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 11:27 am
In a totally different suit, we're facing a class action that claims that we didn't reimburse our employees for their required cell phone use. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:12 pm
With a lot of background facts that read more like they're from a PhD dissertation about California agriculture in the 1800s than a judicial opinion from 2020.I'm not way persuaded that no one would buy this land (for farming or otherwise) and rely solely upon (as one witness testified) the "water from above" to irrigate crops (or water from below -- i.e., a well -- to satisfy these or other needs). [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
The Court of Appeal, partially reversed, based upon its interpretation of the relevant statute.The California Supreme Court then granted review.Now, in that tribunal, we're not willing to simply let one side argue the case without someone representing the contrary position. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm
If Nevada wants judgments to expire after six years (if they're not renewed during the relevant Nevada time frame), why would Nevada allow a plaintiff to circumvent this rule by registering the judgment elsewhere and then "bouncing it back" long after the expiration of the underlying Nevada judgment? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
Nonetheless, I suspect that as you're writing the opinion and hit pages 100 or 120, you start to just want it done and over with. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:43 am
KTTV, 147 Cal. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Moreno, ___ Cal.4th ___ (Oct. 17, 2013) (Sonic II). [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:32 pm
E.g., In re Dresser, 972 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1992). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:33 pm
Cal.). [read post]
