Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,946
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The trial court denied the petition for writ of mandate in its entirety. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:29 pm by David Kopel
(McClure passed away this February.)Initially, FOPA was bottled up. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:53 pm by Ruby Powers
  The number of applications received may include re-filings by applicants whose cases were initially rejected at the Lockbox. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:42 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] In re William Garner,   2010 U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 2:02 am by Deb Givens
  Assuming that Humira was, in fact, a meaningful innovation deserving of its initial patent, AbbVie rightly claimed more than a decade of monopoly profits as a reward. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(Both opinions cited above involve appellate consideration of initial determinations by courts of first instance.) [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Note: just before the Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari, in McReynolds, the 5th Circuit issued its decision in Rodriquez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
If that is the case, then it would need to be re-proposed in January before it can be adopted. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Those will have to be explored by the District Court judges initially. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Daniel Wasserstein
  The new law clarifies that the punishment only extends for a maximum of 2 years. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:19 am by John Jascob
Gensler has recently been Professor of the Practice of Global Economics and Management at MIT Sloan School of Management, Co-Director of MIT’s Fintech@CSAIL and Senior Advisor to the MIT Media Lab Digital Currency Initiative. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Resolving Twiqbal’s applicability has potentially case dispositive implications, especially for a re-enlivened First Amendment defense. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:10 am by admin
    Now, as shown in this Wall Street Journal article, they’re back:   It’s alive! [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
We’re not sure what it all means yet. (2) Well, kind of. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:39 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
That statute, as you recall, allowed homeowner/lessees to petition the Hawaii Housing Authority to exercise eminent domain on the homeowner's behalf and condemn the fee simple interest underneath their homes from the lessor, and transfer it to the lessee upon payment of just compensation. [read post]