Search for: "In re Weaks" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The defense may also object to the systematic weakness in bellwether trials. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:18 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Applicant argued that there is widespread use of the mark BEAR CREEK with wines, attempting to show weakness of the protected mark. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:42 am by Drew Cochran
He can build up your case to make it as strong as possible while also manipulating any and all weak points in the prosecution. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
The government is expecting you to be confused, weak, and scared. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The defense may also object to the systematic weakness in bellwether trials. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And among the designs, concepts, and doctrines of constitutional democracy that have been exposed to abusive borrowing on Dixon & Landau’s telling are “militant democracy,” the doctrine of “unconstitutional constitutional amendments,” and—an idea that I will again come back to—“weak-form” judicial review. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:15 pm
"The Board observed that, under In re Mucky Duck Mustard Co., 6 USPQ2d 1467 (TTAB 1988) and In re Albert Trostel & Sons. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 4:41 am
Broaching a new Sunstein these days, you already know what you’re going to get: a section on the joys and uses of cost-benefit analysis, some dashed-off thoughts about utilitarianism and negative freedoms, three or four chapters on nudges and their importance to the design of seatbelt policy, the primacy of Daniel Kahneman–style 'slow thinking' over intuition and moral heuristics, some tut-tutting about social media, a Learned Hand quote or two, and a few weak… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:33 am
In a non-epic clash of two weak marks, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark ZERO EMISSIONS & Design [shown below, top] for financing services, some related to energy projects [ZERO EMISSIONS disclaimed]. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:13 am
In re Naboso Technology, LLC, Serial No. 87236262 (February 27, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David Mermelstein).Strength of the BAREFOOT marks: As to commercial strength, applicant pointed to eleven registrations for marks comprising the terms BAREFOOT, BARE FOOT, or BARE FEET for a variety of goods and services. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:21 am
In re Innova Agri Bio Park Limited, Serial No. 88489477 (July 7, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cindy B. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 4:24 am
  In re The Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd., Serial No. 79271385 (October 30, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 2:05 pm by Davina Sashkin
 Actually, we’re not sure there are any; but if there are, the FCC is likely to conclude that they too are entitled to protection from LightSquared. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:35 am
In re One Nation Enterprises, Serial No. 86260948 (July 25, 2016) [not precedential].The Board pointed out that the Examining Attorney was correct in asserting that a mark may not be disclaimed in its entirety. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:02 am
In re Mullen Automotive Inc., Application Serial No. 90366095 (April 11, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]