Search for: "Irish v. Irish"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In EMI v Eircom Kelly J said, of the rights of privacy:"the statutory entitlements, whether they arise under the Data Protection legislation of the Postal and telecommunications legislation are subject to a provision which permits the confidentiality to be legitimately breached by an order of the Court. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In EMI v Eircom Kelly J said, of the rights of privacy:"the statutory entitlements, whether they arise under the Data Protection legislation of the Postal and telecommunications legislation are subject to a provision which permits the confidentiality to be legitimately breached by an order of the Court. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:10 pm
With regard to Irish, he’s highly critical of the Mac Cárthaigh decision (where an applicant failed in his bid to secure an Irish-speaking jury). [read post]
28 May 2007, 3:32 am
As an aside (although also a good teaching tool regarding the role of interpretation acts) , I don’t think this particular dispute would arise under Irish law. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
These include * Maynards Confectionery BV v Nestle (Irish Patents Office) - the battle between CARAMAC and CARAMBAR for the hearts and souls of the sweet-toothed Irish;* Beckwith-Moore v Novak - the first decision from the ADR.eu Centre in the Czech Republic, concerning a bizarre attempt to unseat a domain name based on a thoroughly spurious set of earlier registered trade mark and design rights;* Trilux Trade Mark, a ruling of the Polish Supreme Administrative… [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:42 am
He is Irish and always has something to say about the weather. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
Irish v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Back in 2005 in Troll Company A/S v Uneeda Doll Company Ltd Danish company Troll secured preliminary injunctive relief in the US to protect its fuzzy-haired Good Luck Troll doll (right) against Uneeda's predatory Wish-nik (below, left), the District Court ruling that the Wish-niks infringed copyright in the Good Luck Trolls. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:56 am
The European Court of Human rights gave a decision earlier this month in Copland v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:59 pm
US v Barrows (via Findlaw). [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
"The first clause has prompted some to wonder whether Madison knew of Donaldson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:34 am
Cases reported this time round include* The ETERNA trade mark dispute from Germany, on whether shirts bearing that trade mark and handed over to a forwarding agent in the European Union, in the false expectation that they would be exported outside the European Economic Area, have been first marketed in the European Union by the trade mark owner or with its consent;* The recent European Court of Human Rights decision that trade mark applications are protectable possessions, in Anheuser-Busch… [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
Today there are 153 states parties; the United States is not among them.... 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
" by Irish scholar, sage and legal consultant Robert Clark;* A note on the new US trade mark dilution statute by John L. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:37 am
Irrelevant fact: Disney last year had 133,000 employees, Merpel notes - twice as many people as live in metropolitan Galway.Sister Act The Musical hereTangling with Disney can be tough: see Walt Disney v Air Pirates [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:33 am
Muzikowski v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 1:41 am
Cases reported in this issue include * Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Oy - the Finnish Supreme Court decision after the European Court's preliminary ruling as to the use of Gillette's trade marks by a manufacturer of compatible razor blades; Below: from Polish hero to trade mark - the curious fate of Jan III Sobieski* Belvedere's application - an opposition before the Irish Patents Office to an application to register JAN III SOBIESKI as a trade mark, in which the… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:33 pm
In Startzell v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Attorney-Client Privilege Does Not Protect Documents Created in Preparing Report on Rogue Trader's Scheme Allied Irish Banks p.l.c. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:22 pm
What did the Irish do? [read post]
