Search for: "Johnson v. Case" Results 1601 - 1620 of 7,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2024, 8:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
Hobbs provided a thorough review of the relevant case law on recusals, including a reference to the UK Post Office scandal in Bates v Post Office Limited [2019] EWHC 871 (QB), paragraphs [27]-[77] as well as HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) [2015] EWCA Civ 492. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:02 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 173946 (D KA, Oct. 20, 2017), a Kansas federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead against one defendant on his claim that his Ramadan meals were not served early enough.In Johnson v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 2:10 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150125, Aug. 7, 2018) and dismissed an inmate's complaint that a corrections officer threw his prayer mat on the floor and stepped on it, and that plaintiff was refused a new prayer mat.In Johnson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Sands
Johnson, No. 16-10184 (11-27-17)(Tallman w/Siler & Bea). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am by Leah Litman
Davis is the latest in a string of cases stemming from Johnson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:20 pm by lennyesq
Whitehouse and Johnson sent the letter after a New York Times report revealed the right-wing organization, Faith and Action, sought to influence Alito and gain advance knowledge of the court’s ruling in Burwell v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:39 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals this week issued an odd and confusing opinion in a case styled Johnson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:54 pm
  Justices Kennedy and Souter also seemed quite thoroughly unpersuaded that Johnson was free to leave, and Kennedy even contended that the Supreme Court had made clear in a 2007 decision in a roadside case (Brendlin v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 12:28 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Washburn student intern Joshua Mikkelsen and I won in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:08 am by Scott Bomboy
Johnson, and, in the Watergate tapes case, it held the President amenable to subpoena to produce evidence for use in a criminal case without dealing, except obliquely, with its prior opinion. [read post]