Search for: "KELLY v. STATE"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm
V. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:15 am
Kelly two terms ago, but it unexpectedly dumped the case. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:23 pm
Many of those subjected to such detention fees (and associated enforcement action) had hoped that the decision of the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal ("CTTT") in DV Kelly Pty Ltd v China Shipping (Australia) Agency Co Pty Ltd would serve as the basis to cause shipping lines and their agents to review (and reduce) fees and associated enforcement action. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm
Justice Mary Beth Kelly stated when running for the Court, that she felt McCormick was wrongly decided. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:15 am
Jorgensen, 351 F.3d at 51; see also Kelly v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
United States First Circuit, 03/22/2011 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
United States First Circuit, 03/22/2011 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:28 pm
” Justice Marilyn Kelly would have granted reconsideration. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:02 am
State, ex rel., Wyo. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:36 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Watkins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:24 am
The case, Brad & Tiffany Kelly v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:24 am
The case, Brad & Tiffany Kelly v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
Reminds me somewhat of United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:13 am
In these consolidated appeals, Kelly Kamakian appeals from the circuit court’s orders rejecting his claim. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that “Under the circumstances, termination is not a sanction shocking to our sense of fairness,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/discipline-not-barred-by-availability.html=======================The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State is a… [read post]
