Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 5:22 am
To my mind, the case is really a follow-up to Atwater v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Hughes unanimously held that they had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the outcome in Sala was plainly incorrect. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part One
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
Lord Kerr dissented save in respect of the ‘complete code’ issue in a careful and detailed exposition of the issues running to 30 pages (half of the judgment). [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Sales gave the main judgment (with which Lord Reed, Lord Kerr and Lord Kitchen agreed). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
Circuit, while Lyle Denniston of this blog explores the complex arguments advanced by Orin Kerr in Davis. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
As stated by Justice Cromwell for the Supreme Court, in Kerr v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
Oops. * Orin Kerr: The FCC’s broadband privacy regulations are gone. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:56 am
Seattle and Mattos v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
— Orin Kerr (@OrinKerr) May 14, 2019 So which is it, blithely ignoring stability or correcting past errors? [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am
In Kentucky v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:15 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Michael v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another [2012] EWCA Civ 981 – granted on 26 June 2013 by Lord Hope, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Orin Kerr of the Volokh Conspiracy discusses the Commerce Clause implications of Golan, while Christina Gagnier writes on the open Internet implications of the decision for the Huffington Post, Finally, the Court unanimously held in Mims v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
Lord Kerr would have dismissed the appeal. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
Court-watchers continue to focus on Monday’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
On the same day Warby J will hear an assessment of damages in the case of Sloutsker v R [read post]
