Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 8,153
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Although the likelihood of confusion was ordinarily a fact-intensive issue, this was one of the rare instances in which the mark owner’s case was so weak that summary judgment was appropriate, in the Ninth Circuit’s view (Lerner & Rowe PC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:23 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriOpinion Date: 7/9/10Cite: US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
The laws that apply to generic drugs recently shifted in favor of the manufacturers at the expense of injured consumers in 2011 when the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Pilva, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 9:02 pm
This Federal Register Notice states that the PTO will not apply Rules 78(f)(1) and (2) (the presumption of double patenting and requirement to rebut) retroactively, even if the Tafas v Dudas injunction is lifted. [read post]