Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 1601 - 1620 of 39,470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Moreover, there is no equivalent provision in Section 4, which deals with abuses of dominant position and, therefore, is more relevant when deciding on excessive royalties claimed by a patentee.As for the ‘subject matter test’ the court concludes – with very little argumentation (paras 53 to 55) – that Competition Law is the general law and the Patent Act is the special statute. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
If you were not born a US citizen or a close relative of one, there is very little chance you will ever be allowed to emigrate here….. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm by Kevin
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Krishnamurthi and Salib asserted that Students for Fair Admissions will have little practical effect because of cases such as McCleskey v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Particularly because these disclosures may make companies vulnerable to attack, affording them so little time to plan those disclosures and take steps to mitigate any adverse consequences seems unwise. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
While AUCC and York continued to spend money and go nowhere, some institutions realized that there was no need and no point in spending lots of money for little or no value. [read post]