Search for: "London v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
However in The Bank of London Group Limited v Simmons & Simmons LLP, the court dismissed an application for an injunction by a start-up bank stating that there was no reason to suspect a breach of confidentiality. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am by Adam Chandler
(The petition, in Rosario v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
In that email, Mr Perry stated that he had received a letter purported to come from Judge Hacon himself. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Links to the business and human rights governance constellation Panellists include Professor Larry Catá Backer (Pennsylvania State University), Professor Dorothée Baumann-Pauly (University of Geneva), Dr David Birchall (London South Bank University), Dr Jernej Letnar Černič (Nova Univerza, Slovenia), Dr Sorcha McLeod (University of Copenhagen) and Dr Miho Taka (Coventry University). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
County Court at Central London, 18 December 2015 Mr M had applied to Southwark as homeless. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
 * Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by Matthew Hill
At that time the domestic case law – and in particular the High Court decision in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2006] EWHC 356 and the Court of Appeal in R (Takoushis) v Inner North London Coroner and Another [2005] EWCA Civ 1440  – stated that the death by his own hand or actions of a person who was not formally detained by the state could not (other than in particular circumstances not applicable in Mr Reynolds… [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
  Why involve some sheik from Saudi Arabia, a London solicitor living in his Mum's basement and a couple former Congressmen to deliver a bushel of sweet potatoes? [read post]