Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The judgment appelaed is [2018] EWCA Civ 2026 and will be heard at 10:30am in Courtroom Two by Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
The judgment in this still has not been released. 14 July | Law Review: Lord Judge LCJ on the State of The Nation – an important speech: Charon QC summarises Lord Judge’s speech. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Lord Hoffmann (in the minority) gave real weight to the editorial discretion, stating at [62]: “Editorial decisions have to be made quickly and with less information than is available to a court which afterwards reviews the matter at leisure. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smolin, Kids Are Not Cakes: A Children's Rights Perspective on Fulton v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 1:42 am
Helfer & Mikael Rask Madsen, International Court Authority in Question: Introduction to Part III Andrei Marmor, Authority of International Courts: Scope, Power and Legitimacy Michael Zürn, International Courts: Command v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:37 am
The principle, sometimes called the rule on maintenance of capital, was authoritatively stated by the House of Lords in Trevor v Whitworth, and has been subsequently applied both by the courts and in statutory provisions. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
This was a matter which had divided the House of Lords, and consequently been left open, in R v G (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2008] UKHL 37, in which a decision to prosecute a 15 year old for sexual intercourse with a 12 year old was challenged. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:57 am by INFORRM
The Defendant also sought to rely on the principle that no impediment should be placed in the way of witnesses willing to give evidence, citing Lord Judge CJ in HM Attorney-General v MGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 2074. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Justice Hooper adopted Mr Justice Baker’s reasoning as to why this was a special case. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:37 am by Legal Beagle
”However, it should be noted Lord McCluskey’s initial report clearly states : “We do not suggest that the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court should be ended. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Hyun Woo Kang
That case also involved the House of Lords rejecting the former fundamental breach doctrine and firmly stating that the question is one of construction, not merely of the exclusion clause alone, but of the whole contract. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:35 am by Steve Lubet
  It reads like this: I AM the LORD thy God. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael Lowe
In Texas, both federal and state laws exist to protect people like Hephzibal Olivia Lord from being overwhelmed and mistreated by police during criminal investigations. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]