Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 5,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2019, 8:59 am
The accommodation requirement comes from the Fair Housing Act itself (Section 3614(f)(3)(B)), but the only mention of animals in the regulations is a reference to guide dogs for the blind as an example of a required accommodation. (24 CFR §100.204(b))** Except for that and another example the regulation merely quotes the statute. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:57 pm
(p. 59) (emphasis added) The Ninth Circuit went on to hold that Cisco meets this “knowing assistance” (p. 39) standard. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 3:48 pm
At the law school level, Interim Law School Dean James B. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
By Joy P. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 6:28 pm
By Joy P. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:36 pm
B suffers severe emotional distress. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
P. 3002.1 in the instant bankruptcy case. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
B. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
General challenge w/non word marks is we don’t have good system for forcing the P to articulate its claim. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
The SEC proposed an array of new cybersecurity-related requirements in the form of: (1) an expansive new Rule 10, (2) extending the reach of Regulation SCI, and (3) expanding Regulation S-P, including to require incident response programs. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
”Ms B denied having received that letter of 11 August. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
”Ms B denied having received that letter of 11 August. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:59 am
Accordingly, the court found that it was competent to resolve the matter without waiting for the FDA to weigh in. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:48 am
(a) It is a defense to prosecution that the actor through mistake formed a reasonable belief about a matter of fact if his mistaken belief negated the kind of culpability required for commission of the offense. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
After the petitioner and DSS submitted memoranda of law, the matter was submitted to the court for decision. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
The disclaimer of claim 1 (“non-human”) excludes human beings in order to satisfy A 53(a) while the disclaimers of claims 11 and 14 exclude subject-matter which is not patentable under A 53(b) taken in combination with R 28, paragraphs b) and c). [4] The three disclaimers which exclude subject-matter not eligible for patent protection and only serve the purpose of removing specific legal obstacles do not contribute to the invention. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
Is it just a matter of its there-ness for us?] [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 12:33 pm
P. 34(b)(iii), argued that it should not now be required to re-produce all those documents in another form. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(b).) [read post]
