Search for: "Majors v. Majors" Results 1601 - 1620 of 55,280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2007, 12:27 pm
The original opinion said that only Justice Duffy joined Justice McAdams's majority opinion. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm by Legal Skills Prof
The major findings (abridged): Law professors are significantly more liberal on average than lawyers overall (CFscore of -0.84 compared to -0.31)... [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:42 am by Ellen Podgor
Looking at the dissents: Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson) Yes, Let's Look at the Facts - They include facts, something oddly omitted in the majority opinion. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In giving the lead majority judgment Lord Mance stated that although the present situation may not have been foreseen by the legislature, it is not a reason for reading into clear legislation a specific exemption which would not reflect the scope of any exemption in EU law. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
By a majority of 6:1 they ruled that reg 18 of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 was incompatible with the Council Directive 2003/4/EC and must be treated as invalid. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:39 am
The majority (led by Justice Corrigan) and dissent (authored by Justice Kennard) disagree on whether there's constitutional or prejudicial error. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the majority of the Extra Division of the Inner House erred in law in their interpretation of the Divorce Etc (Pensions) (Scotland) Regulations 2000, reg 4 by determining that the phrase “period of membership” referred only to the period when contributions towards a pension are being made. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
  In its earlier opinion, a four-justice majority had overruled prior precedent in Preserve the Dunes v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:45 am by Immigration Prof
A little over a week ago, an equally divided Supreme Court left intact a lower court injunction barring the implementation of a major immigration initiative of the Obama administration. [read post]