Search for: "Matter of Appeal From Civil Penalty" Results 1601 - 1620 of 2,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  ANY STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY THE WRITER TO BE USED, AND NOTHING CONTAINED HEREIN CAN BE USED BY YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON, FOR THE PURPOSE OF (1) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED UNDER FEDERAL TAX LAW, OR (2) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY TAX-RELATED TRANSACTION OR MATTER ADDRESSED HEREIN. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
However, upon appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the public interest defence should be assessed at trial. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Rivera was ordered to pay a $456,000 civil penalty to the FEC after the agency showed he secretly financed the primary campaign of another candidate to “weaken” his likely 2012 general election opponent. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:42 pm
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/03/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/08/07 1ST REPORT CAL.1201/09/07 2ND REPORT CAL.01/16/07 ADVANCED TO THIRD READING01/23/07 PASSED SENATE01/23/07 DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY01/23/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSS650 VOLKER -- Provides for the civil commitment of sexually violent predatorsSUMM : Add Art 10 SS10.01 - 10.19, amd SS33.13, 43.03 & 9.27, Ment Hyg L; amd SS168-a, 402 & 404, add S622, Cor L; amd SS200.50, 220.10, 220.15, 310.50, 380.60, 380.70, 390.50,… [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:04 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They argued that the company was not excused from its obligation to obtain its consent prior to settlement with the SEC and was not excused from its duty to cooperate. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
FEC Case Dissent from Dismissal Commissioners’ Statement of Reasons (May 6, 2021) Federal Election Commission, Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
In a hearing last month, the High Court granted Assange permission to appeal if the US government were unable to provide assurances that he would be permitted to rely on the first amendment, would not be prejudiced at trial and that the death penalty would not be imposed. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm by Law Lady
Criminal law -- Habeas corpus -- Counsel -- Ineffectiveness -- Section 2254(d), which, as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, limits the availability of federal habeas relief for claims previously “adjudicated on the merits” in state court proceedings, applies to petition for federal habeas relief when state court's order denying relief is unaccompanied by an opinion explaining the court's reasoning -- Petitioner was not entitled to the habeas… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
§ 2462, which applies to any action for the enforcement of any civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
Yallup from the criminal statutes governing use of the roadways, or from the licensing and non-impaired driving requirements under state law. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court agreed to hear a case on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) individual mandate, which requires individuals without health insurance to pay a tax penalty. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:59 am by SHG
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces unleashed caustic criticism of all involved. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The $9,500 fine levied against Ring Power Corp., which sells and leases industrial machinery, represents a rare penalty for a company found to have violated a 75-year-old ban on campaign contributions from federal contractors. [read post]
6 May 2019, 5:44 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
To resolve OCR charges arising from these events, Touchstone agreed to pay OCR $3,000,000. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, was confirmed to the court in February 1988 by a vote of 97-0. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The total $19.35 million in fines, forfeiture, and civil settlement payments was the second-largest amount ever paid in the resolution of a food safety matter. [read post]