Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 4:47 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter which formula you use, your effective tax rate will always be lower than your marginal tax rate. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:49 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Document D1 was therefore comprised in the state of the art according to Article 54(3) EPC.The opposition division further held that claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 7 December 2010 did not contain subject-matter which extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claims did not… [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Appeal allowed and the matter remitted to the County Court with the article 8 defence re-instated. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
Author’s note: Although I consulted with CIA and NSA officials regarding the accuracy of certain portions of this article (and I am grateful for their assistance), and although the article was reviewed by the government to ensure that it does not contain classified information, the views expressed are solely my own, and errors solely my responsibility. *** On January 18, 2017, the CIA declassified and released new internal Central Intelligence Agency Activities:  Procedures Approved by… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
The question — should this be read as employees involved in (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, (h) packing for shipment, or (i) distribution of those products — a broad interpretation, favored by the employer — or (a) canning, (b) processing, (c) preserving, (d) freezing, (e) drying, (f) marketing, (g) storing, or (h) packing for shipment or distribution of those products — a… [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court’s atextual reading of 35 U.S.C. 101 has created a set of subject matter excluded from patentability – including abstract ideas. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm by Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic
He authored an op-ed published on Election Day while serving as a prominent national security advisor to the Republican nominee, calling for the extradition of Turkish cleric and dissident Fethullah Gülen without disclosing he was being paid by an organization linked to the Turkish government, which has pushed for Gülen’s extradition. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:54 am by Jeroen Willekens
The points of dispute are whether the subject-matter of claim 1, in particular features (7a) to (9) and some alternatives recited by features (4a) and (6a), can be considered to be disclosed in the priority document as a whole, taking the drawings into account.3.3 In opinion G 2/98, the Enlarged Board ruled that the requirement for claiming priority of "the same invention", referred to in Article 87(1) EPC, meant that "priority of a previous application in respect of… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am by Quinta Jurecic
       (c)  The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by litigation. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 5:14 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
” Hence, the Executive Order mandates that “In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who: “(a)  Have been convicted of any… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
Summary of conclusions reached 5‑year prescription:  awareness of loss, sections 11(3) and 6(4) [5]        While it is possible that losses which were easily identifiable by HC may have occurred in 2007, leading to the triggering of the 5‑year prescription in 2007 (i.e. more than five years before the actions were raised in 2014:  see paragraphs [58] to [61] below), this is a matter of dispute which cannot be resolved on the… [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am by Nico Cordes
The limiting feature could not be maintained in the patent in view of Article 100(c) EPC, nor could it be removed from the claims without violating Article 123(3) EPC. [read post]