Search for: "Matter of Will of Church"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 6,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2017, 8:30 am
Carlisle, and Mrs Thompson, and I took care of the Presbyterian church and the Baptist church. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:58 pm
For those in South Carolina, however, this is not a trivial matter. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 10:17 am
As a religious-freedom matter, though -- and, to be clear, to say this is not to suggest that Cardinal Mahony has exercised well the power, and responded well to the trust, that his Church (and, members of that Church believe, God) placed in him -- this prosecution is troubling. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:41 pm
(For more background on the issues at stake, see this earlier post.)As his counterpart in Texas saw the matter, so might Judge Houck: why bother to get into the messy details of a federal trademark action if the earlier case filed in State court will dispose of the matter? [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
(So she did not withdraw from all further matters in the case.) [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:50 am
Covenant Presbyterian Church discussed a host of issues. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
(So she did not withdraw from all further matters in the case.) [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:03 pm
The Church dropped the matter until 2002 when it reapplied for the exemption. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 12:03 pm
The Church dropped the matter until 2002 when it reapplied for the exemption. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] As to the IDA's condemnation of the deed restrictions, however, although the Harts were unable to demonstrate their status as condemnees in this regard, 1667 may seek review of that part of the IDA's determination given its undisputed status as an owner of property subject to said restrictions (see Matter of Faith Temple Church v Town of Brighton, 17 AD3d 1072, 1072-1073 [4th Dept 2005]; compare Matter of Allied Healthcare Prods., Inc. v… [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
[FN1] As to the IDA's condemnation of the deed restrictions, however, although the Harts were unable to demonstrate their status as condemnees in this regard, 1667 may seek review of that part of the IDA's determination given its undisputed status as an owner of property subject to said restrictions (see Matter of Faith Temple Church v Town of Brighton, 17 AD3d 1072, 1072-1073 [4th Dept 2005]; compare Matter of Allied Healthcare Prods., Inc. v… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 3:08 pm
It is possible to think that some activities ought to be a matter of choice but that others shouldn't have to subsidize them. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:51 pm
We fully expect the media to continue harping on this cassock-and-dager stuff in order to create material for their daily coverage of the Church during the conclave, but it’s important to keep our eyes on the true stakes of this election, which matters to non-Catholics across the globe as much as it matters to Catholics. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:49 am
The Church appealed. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
SCOV reasons that since the new permit was granted, that argument no longer matters. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:55 am
The matter is still pending before the High Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:31 am
He already knows what the common good is, because the Church has revealed it to us. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 12:23 am
” did relate to matters reserved to the Parliament of the United Kingdom under the Scotland Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:22 am
But there’s another section of the speech that isn’t quoted as often that also needs to be heard and heeded: “I do not speak for my church on public matters, and the church does not speak for me. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
doesn't matter in the slightest. [read post]
