Search for: "Mitchell v. Mitchell" Results 1601 - 1620 of 3,054
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am by Lyle Denniston
Mitchell, put that argument before the  Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 1:41 pm by SJM
Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd is actually a defamation case but it is an essential point of reference for anybody involved in civil litigation.The case concerns the scope of the new CPR 3.9(1), which concerns applications for relief from court sanctions, and which replaced the old checklist from 1/4/13:“On an application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order, the court will consider all the… [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 1:41 pm by SJM
Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd is actually a defamation case but it is an essential point of reference for anybody involved in civil litigation.The case concerns the scope of the new CPR 3.9(1), which concerns applications for relief from court sanctions, and which replaced the old checklist from 1/4/13:“On an application for relief from any sanction imposed for a failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order, the court will consider all the… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Also, over on LXBN TV, Claire Mitchell joins me to discuss the FDA potentially moving to ban trans fats. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On an issue of apparent first impression in the case of Lexington Insurance v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
On an issue of apparent first impression in the case of Lexington Insurance v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:24 am by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal has unanimously dismissed the appeal in the costs budgeting case of Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1526 (part of the “Plebgate” saga). [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:18 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Drunk Driving Verdict" by Max Mitchell of The Legal Intelligencer.The verdict was issued in the case of Trail v. [read post]