Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 1,808
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:50 am
., United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:50 am
., United States v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor) New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist) United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat) United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and… [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
See Friedman v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Sargent is not compensated for news connected to a service or product. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
United Parcel Service, No. 08-60448 (5th Cir. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:28 am
Currently, most ethanol in the United States is produced from domestically grown corn, and the rapid rise in the fuel's production and usage means that roughly one-quarter of all corn grown in the United States is now used to produce ethanol. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
” [17] The enforcement unit of the Fina [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Body Blue Inc.; Synergism Arithmetically Compounded Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
However, a court can refuse to order the disclosure of documents where the information is of minimal importance to the litigation but may constitute a serious invasion of privacy.27 A private document is, quite simply, any document that is not public, and includes private Facebook profiles.28 This creates a dilemma for a party seeking production of a private Facebook page: in order for a court to order production of a document, a court requires evid [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
Int'l Group, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
(decided on February 17, 2009, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 08 Civ. 323(PKC)). [read post]
