Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 7,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
For example, in R. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:06 am
Hudson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 7:17 pm
The Tribunal justified this distinction by referring to a number of B.C. cases, Mailloux v Tofino (District) at para 111, and Whistler (Resort Municipality) v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See Mark P. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Scholars have long debated the relative merits of each. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 2:06 pm
For example, in People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
The art works at issue often feature naked or scantily-dressed women holding Dom Pérignon champagne bottles and, in some instances, mere outlines of such bottles and their iconic label. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 4:36 pm
The right to have personal information and data deleted from a website, so long as its removal does not interfere with others’ right to free expression, was most recently confirmed by the CJEU in the Google v CNIL case. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:37 am
P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:41 am
Garcia, 401 P.3d 588 (Kan. 2017). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm
Rafuse, 1986 CanLII 29 (SCC), [1986] 2 S.C.R. 147, at p. 224; Ryan, at paras. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am
Furthermore, the CPVO has a broad discretion to declare a plant variety right null and void under Article 20 of the Basic Regulation, which it exercises on the basis of the evidence submitted to it by the applicant for a declaration of nullity (see Brookfield New Zealand and Elaris v CPVO and Schniga C-534/10 P). [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am
(Irwin Toy Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 7:14 pm
In Shakur v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 4:43 pm
Annoyer v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
Price v Filtcraft | Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week | That was a long break, now let’s go back south | A European perspective on paparazzi photographs of celebrities and lawsuits against celebrities over the posting of photographs of themselves | Around the IP Blogs | Monday MiscellanyNever Too Late 237 [Week ending 13th October] Fighting for your IP rights in Denmark – it’s expensive, but now maybe less so? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:07 am
See, Poschmann v. [read post]
