Search for: "People v Fields" Results 1601 - 1620 of 4,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:18 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
PatCon V will be April 10-11 at Kansas.Here are some other large academic conferences that often have IP-specific panels or significant overlap with folks interested in IP. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am by Ben
Calling the blocks "ineffectual", the court also stated that the blockades "constitute an infringement of [people's] freedom to act at their discretion". [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm by Linda A. Kerns
” The United States Supreme Court recently tried to clarify the meaning of this law in the case Elonis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Managing Intellectual Property magazine is compiling its annual list of the 50 most influential people in the field of intellectual property this year. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 11:02 am by Joshua Richman
ASTM, for example, has developed more than 12,000 standards used in fields ranging from consumer products to construction to medical services and devices. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
 Judge Kara Stoll agreed explaining that at certain points in her career she had to make decisions about what path she wanted to pursue - litigation v prosecution, district v appellate work - and that required active decision making. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Common general knowledge (CGK) in Tdocs Tdocs will be familiar to those working in the telecommunications field. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 10:02 pm by Liz Bradshaw
Notes from the Field: Increase in Vibrio parahaemolyticus Infections Associated with Consumption of Atlantic Coast Shellfish – 2013. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court’s agreement to rule on the SCA Hygiene Products case makes that something of a sequel in the patent field to a 2014 ruling by the Justices on copyright law — the six-to-three ruling in Petrella v. [read post]